❓Big Problem
According to the World Bank and FAO, the world's forest area has shrunk by an estimated 80 million hectares, or 1 million square kilometers, since 1990.
The need for innovative solutions to combat deforestation and preserve the environment is clear. There is an urgent global need for commercial reforestation programs to replace the rapidly dwindling stocks of tropical forests, which provide over 75% of the world's trade in softwood logs, over 50% of the trade in hardwood lumber, and a significant portion of panels and pulp.
This is a very serious problem. Forests and trees make the Earth habitable. They store huge amounts of carbon, which mitigates climate change, and are important for protecting against global warming.
The current approaches to reforestation have a number of disadvantages, including:
The complexity of investing
Forestry companies face a number of challenges, such as limited capital, management and distribution problems, as well as the need for sustainable investment solutions. Meanwhile, traditional investment opportunities in forestry remain inaccessible to a number of potential investors due to high capital requirements and geographic restrictions. This limits the participation of private investors in the forestry industry and makes it difficult to promote sustainable forest management.
Ineffective tree species
Many reforestation projects focus on planting species that will be profitable and will not help in ecological restoration. This can lead to a lack of biodiversity and increased vulnerability to pests and diseases. For example, the Green Belt Movement in Kenya has been criticized for promoting eucalyptus plantations [2, source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228647903_Monoculture_plantations_in_Kenya].
Lack of transparency in monitoring
Some reforestation projects lack proper monitoring and verification systems, which calls into question their effectiveness. For example, the Bonn Challenge, a global effort to restore 150 million hectares of deforested land by 2020, has come under scrutiny due to discrepancies between actual and reported activity [3, source: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/meetings/2019/20191216/2019-10-belgrade-rioconv-begeladze.pdf].
Contradictions related to carbon footprint compensation
Companies that invest in forest restoration projects as a way to offset their carbon emissions can be criticized for not addressing the root causes of emissions. For example, Shell's investments in forest restoration projects have been criticized as a way to "greenwash" its investments in fossil fuels. This is a major issue stemming from the lack of transparency.
Last updated
